<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for React. Adapt.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reactadapt.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk</link>
	<description>Social media consultancy based in Bristol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #Twitterview: Introducing our new Content &amp; Communities Manager by #Twitterview: Introducing our new Content &#38; Communities Manager &#124; hjfantaskis</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/twitterview-introducing-content-communities-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>#Twitterview: Introducing our new Content &#38; Communities Manager &#124; hjfantaskis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=667#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] (Published and edited with permission from React. Adapt.&#8217;s blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Published and edited with permission from React. Adapt.&#8217;s blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook: Will it be the new internet? by alexeiL</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/facebook-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>alexeiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=564#comment-43</guid>
		<description>hi Richard,

Thanks for the comments.  I don&#039;t view advertising as immoral (although it can be annoying) and I welcome discussion around the ethics of fan buying services. But I also reserve the right, as blog owner, to remove the link from your comments as I don&#039;t wish to give the site a free backlink.

If they&#039;d like to advertise on my blog I&#039;d be happy to forward them a rate card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Richard,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.  I don&#8217;t view advertising as immoral (although it can be annoying) and I welcome discussion around the ethics of fan buying services. But I also reserve the right, as blog owner, to remove the link from your comments as I don&#8217;t wish to give the site a free backlink.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;d like to advertise on my blog I&#8217;d be happy to forward them a rate card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook: Will it be the new internet? by Richard</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/facebook-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=564#comment-42</guid>
		<description>alexeiL, you&#039;re right about Google being bad at social stuff. Their weakness starts at the top - they&#039;re fixated on algorithms and trying to solve problems programmatically and have an inherent weakness at looking at people. They only hire programmers that are gifted at algorithms and computation, not thinkers that look at entire problems and come up with brilliant social solutions.

PS: What, may I ask, was so objectionable about the following link, GetMorePopular, that you felt it necessary to edit my post? It&#039;s a large part of what social media advertising is all about right now. It&#039;s worthy of mention and discussion. I don&#039;t view advertising as immoral, do you? If you feel the need to edit posts, you should mention that somewhere in the commenting form because altering peoples posts just because you disagree with something isn&#039;t too cool. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alexeiL, you&#8217;re right about Google being bad at social stuff. Their weakness starts at the top &#8211; they&#8217;re fixated on algorithms and trying to solve problems programmatically and have an inherent weakness at looking at people. They only hire programmers that are gifted at algorithms and computation, not thinkers that look at entire problems and come up with brilliant social solutions.</p>
<p>PS: What, may I ask, was so objectionable about the following link, GetMorePopular, that you felt it necessary to edit my post? It&#8217;s a large part of what social media advertising is all about right now. It&#8217;s worthy of mention and discussion. I don&#8217;t view advertising as immoral, do you? If you feel the need to edit posts, you should mention that somewhere in the commenting form because altering peoples posts just because you disagree with something isn&#8217;t too cool. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook: Will it be the new internet? by alexeiL</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/facebook-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>alexeiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=564#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Richard.  One major difference between AOL &amp; Facebook (apart from AOL&#039;s lack of business sense) is the social connectivity that Facebook offers.  Google have missed out because they just aren&#039;t good at social (look at Latitude, Wave &amp; Buzz - all failures). 
 
Futurologists have been talking about the impending arrival of &#039;semantic&#039; web for a while now.  But I wonder if any of them predicted this might come about through only one brand?  Facebook are pioneering the new web and moving things forward in leaps &amp; bounds, but that&#039;s also quite scary because they are the most controlling social platform in terms of deciding what content people see and interact with.  

By the way - I hope you aren&#039;t associated with that fan buying site because I wholly disagree with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Richard.  One major difference between AOL &amp; Facebook (apart from AOL&#8217;s lack of business sense) is the social connectivity that Facebook offers.  Google have missed out because they just aren&#8217;t good at social (look at Latitude, Wave &amp; Buzz &#8211; all failures). </p>
<p>Futurologists have been talking about the impending arrival of &#8216;semantic&#8217; web for a while now.  But I wonder if any of them predicted this might come about through only one brand?  Facebook are pioneering the new web and moving things forward in leaps &amp; bounds, but that&#8217;s also quite scary because they are the most controlling social platform in terms of deciding what content people see and interact with.  </p>
<p>By the way &#8211; I hope you aren&#8217;t associated with that fan buying site because I wholly disagree with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook: Will it be the new internet? by Richard</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/facebook-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=564#comment-40</guid>
		<description>In the late 90s, basically everybody was getting internet access through AOL and it looked like they were set to dominate the internet. However, AOL&#039;s management was incompetent and let the opportunity slip through their fingers. Despite some PR gaffes, Facebook&#039;s management is very talented and I think they do have a shot at dominating the internet. Clearly, identity is a very important concept online and having your profile in one place is very important. I see internet advertising trending away from Google search to Facebook somehow. Clearly advertising on Facebook and other social media is so important to some people that people are even buying Facebook fans so I think they&#039;re pretty much going to dominate the future.

One interesting fact to me is that Facebook accounts for 25% of all page views online, but a small percentage of revenue. I&#039;d bet they&#039;ll continue to chip away at what Google is doing and anybody who has any Facebook stock is going to be very rich in 5 years. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the late 90s, basically everybody was getting internet access through AOL and it looked like they were set to dominate the internet. However, AOL&#8217;s management was incompetent and let the opportunity slip through their fingers. Despite some PR gaffes, Facebook&#8217;s management is very talented and I think they do have a shot at dominating the internet. Clearly, identity is a very important concept online and having your profile in one place is very important. I see internet advertising trending away from Google search to Facebook somehow. Clearly advertising on Facebook and other social media is so important to some people that people are even buying Facebook fans so I think they&#8217;re pretty much going to dominate the future.</p>
<p>One interesting fact to me is that Facebook accounts for 25% of all page views online, but a small percentage of revenue. I&#8217;d bet they&#8217;ll continue to chip away at what Google is doing and anybody who has any Facebook stock is going to be very rich in 5 years. <img src='http://reactadapt.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digg is dead, long live the new Digg4 by alexeiL</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/digg-dead-long-live-digg4/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>alexeiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=517#comment-37</guid>
		<description>hi Si

It&#039;s open to the public so you shouldn&#039;t need one now :)  But let me know if you need me to invite you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Si</p>
<p>It&#8217;s open to the public so you shouldn&#8217;t need one now <img src='http://reactadapt.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   But let me know if you need me to invite you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digg is dead, long live the new Digg4 by Simon Quance</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/digg-dead-long-live-digg4/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Quance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=517#comment-36</guid>
		<description>...you got that last invite going begging still?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;you got that last invite going begging still?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MeasurementCamp: How fashion brands are embracing social media by alexeiL</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/measurementcamp-fashion-brands-embracing-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>alexeiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=508#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hi Olivia, I seem to have over-looked approving this comment, so apologies for that!

Thanks for the kind words, always nice to hear from the people at Radian6, after all you are on the ground and immersed in the business of measurement every day!

The facility to tap real-time data is certainly a great and much needed campaign tool for me, as it allows for the continuous review and adaptation (or reaction &amp; adaption...ehem!) of communication &amp; content strategy.

But it is still an uphill struggle in many cases to convince clients to spend that extra bit of budget that will allow for ongoing monitoring.  As general understanding of social media increases  though, so does the willingness to commit so I always offer it as an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Olivia, I seem to have over-looked approving this comment, so apologies for that!</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words, always nice to hear from the people at Radian6, after all you are on the ground and immersed in the business of measurement every day!</p>
<p>The facility to tap real-time data is certainly a great and much needed campaign tool for me, as it allows for the continuous review and adaptation (or reaction &amp; adaption&#8230;ehem!) of communication &amp; content strategy.</p>
<p>But it is still an uphill struggle in many cases to convince clients to spend that extra bit of budget that will allow for ongoing monitoring.  As general understanding of social media increases  though, so does the willingness to commit so I always offer it as an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MeasurementCamp: How fashion brands are embracing social media by Olivia Landolt</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/measurementcamp-fashion-brands-embracing-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Landolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=508#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the event Alexei. There is a huge demand for case studies as companies are slowly warming to the idea of integrating a social media strategy so posts like these are hugely helpful. 

As you&#039;ve mentioned one size does not fit all which makes it all the more essential to share and discuss differing view points and experiences. What&#039;s interesting about measurement in social media is that there is an opportunity for brands to tap into real time data, whether they are measuring a particular campaign, sentiment towards a product or conversation around the brand. This in return presents the opportunity for engagement which in my opinion makes social media and the ability to measure effectively even more invaluable. 

I look forward to reading more.

Olivia Landolt
Marketing and Community Manager

@6Consulting &#124; UK authorised Radian6 reseller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the event Alexei. There is a huge demand for case studies as companies are slowly warming to the idea of integrating a social media strategy so posts like these are hugely helpful. </p>
<p>As you&#8217;ve mentioned one size does not fit all which makes it all the more essential to share and discuss differing view points and experiences. What&#8217;s interesting about measurement in social media is that there is an opportunity for brands to tap into real time data, whether they are measuring a particular campaign, sentiment towards a product or conversation around the brand. This in return presents the opportunity for engagement which in my opinion makes social media and the ability to measure effectively even more invaluable. </p>
<p>I look forward to reading more.</p>
<p>Olivia Landolt<br />
Marketing and Community Manager</p>
<p>@6Consulting | UK authorised Radian6 reseller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digg is dead, long live the new Digg4 by alexeiL</title>
		<link>http://reactadapt.co.uk/trends/digg-dead-long-live-digg4/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>alexeiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reactadapt.co.uk/?p=517#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Invite sent - enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invite sent &#8211; enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

